Publius Huldah Exposingthe Dangers of an Art V Convention Youtube
Proclamation of Independence, Constitution & Bill of Rights
| Moses (c. 1300'south B.C.)--a Prophet | Ten Commandements on front bronze doors of the United States Supreme Courtroom edifice |
| | U.s.a. Supreme Court |
| The Swiss Reformers symbolized Lady Justice with no blindfold and her sword pointing to the open Bible at her feet--the Reformers believed Revealed constabulary (sola scriptura) is the only manner for a nation to have moral laws. Natural (i.e. secular) constabulary was a fraud--the pagans ever had a blindfolded Lady Justice. | In 1789, President Thomas Jefferson warned that the judiciary if given too much power might ruin our Republic, and destroy our Rights! "The new Constitution has secured these in the Executive and Legislative department: but not in the Judiciary..." |
Topics covered: 1. Jury Nullification; 2. What is the correct way to interpret the Constitution?; iii. What nigh Darwinism's influence on Police?; 4. Should Natural Rights/Natural Police be rejected?; 5. Judges: Should they exist elected or appointed?; 6. Why the Sheriff'south Part is the most of import Police force Enforcement Bureau in the Land; 7. Are Corporations entitled to free spoken communication?; 8. Is Administrative Police Constitutional?; 9. Restraining Orders out of Control; 10. Say No for a Con-Con; 11. What about the Patriot Human action Extension?; 12. What near the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)?; 13. Nullification by States--remember the Fugitive Slave Police?; 14. Qualifications for President of the United States and What is a Natural Born Citizen?; 15. Natural Born Citizen defined by our Framers; 16. The Truth about the Bundy Ranch in Nevada and How the Authorities is Lying and 17. Helpful articles and resourses on the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
(See Frontline Fellowship for information from Dr. Peter Hammond on Political & Social Issues and Dr. Thomas E. Forest Jr. (BA Harvard, M.Phil., & Ph.D. from Columbia) explains in a YouTube interview what the 10th Amendment means and our rigged system in the United States.
Too, run across the following the manufactures entitled Where did the U.Due south., Britian and Switzerland get many of its principles for government? & America No Longer has a Operation Judicial Organization (07/22/13) & Biblical Quotations in the Pennsylvania State Capitol--PDF & American History They Don't Desire You To Know (01/16/15) --The truth about Constitution; nosotros did not come from Greek Democracy (see Idiot box video). As well, see Kris Anne Hall, Esq. -- Ramble Attorney, Educator, Writer, Speaker, Radio Host & Publius-Huldah's Blog (Understanding the Constitution) & Original Intent on the Constitution -- this is not promoting Theonomy; nonetheless, many principles were applied from the Bible.
And Why the Electoral College is Important & Infanticide and Ballgame promoter O'Rourke, a Secular Humanist Globalist Irish homo who is "not" Spanish, Says "In that location is a lot Wisdom" to "Warren'south call to End the Electoral College ) -- Robert Francis O'Rourke known every bit Beto, who is not Castilian, is married to a billionaire heiress. His father- in- constabulary is worth $20 billion. He was charged with a DUI and has been arrested for Burglary.
Christianity and the Constitution: The Faith of Our Founding Fathers 
Past John Eidsmoe - Baker Book Business firm (1995) - Paperback - 480 pages - ISBN 0801052319
In this book, Dr. Eidsmoe shows clearly how most of our founding fathers were non secular men, equally nosotros oftentimes hear today. He explains how the influence of Calvinism gave ascent to our republican course of government. He also documents how our founding fathers embodied several biblical principles in the Constitution. This book is recommended for anyone who wants to learn about our nation's truly Christian heritage, which has been virtually expunged by the secular revisionists. - from the Frontwards.
Historical and Theological Foundations of Constabulary (3 Volume Ready) past Dr. John Eidsmoe, who is a retired Lt. Colonel in the Air Strength and a Colonel in the Alabama Land Defense, Professor and Constitutional Attorney. Unfortunetly, Dr. Eidsmoe is not enlightened that Natural Police force is anti-Christian and Luther condemned it (see Dr. Robert A. Morey's volume entitled The Bible, Natural Theology, and Natural Constabulary: Disharmonize or Compromise? below). And Political Christianity--for the last 125 years, many evangelicals take surrendered nether the white flage of pietism, refusing to enter the "wordly" political arena. This has resulted in God and His Word to be shut out of politics and allowing the secular humanists to install a new Savior--the State and Make Your Vote Count--What the Bible Says on the Problems.
(Come across the Politics/Voting tab and Internet News tab for further information on what is actually happening-- most evangelicals and so-called conservatives and liberals practice not empathise what is happening in the political arena and how they are being misled past both political parties (Republican and Democrat), especially the phony well-known and so-called conservative talk radio hosts. NJIAT does non like the term conservative (it lost its meaning). A Christian is suppose to apply the Lordship of Christ to all areas of life--you have stupid Christians with their heads in the sand supporting free-trade agreements such every bit NAFTA that has destroyed the heart class and poor, NDAA that passed in 2011, the Patriot Act, callous drug laws, unjustified wars based on a lie, anti-gun legislation, same sexual practice marriage, Obamacare written by the insurance companies, voting for an anti-Christ, etc.)
The Rutherford Institute--free articles on the Constitution
Vision Viewpoint: America, Christianity, Historic Values Challenged & Under Siege
The Rutherford Constitute--problems such as free voice communication, search & seizure, parents rights, etc.
Family Guardian -- Nonprofit Christian religious ministry dedicated to protecting people and families from extortion, persecution, exploitation,socialism, divorce, crime, and sin. Advocate personal liberty, personal responsibility, constitutional and Modest and accountable government, sovereignty, and religious organized religion.
Notation: Our system is broken in the U.s.a. and y'all may know what your rights are; withal, I would continue to pay your taxes and annals and insure your vehicles & obey other laws, etc. because if y'all disregard the law (whether it is an illegitimate law per Constitution or non) yous will nearly likely get arrested. If you are in jail, yous cannot fight for your rights (there are limits, of course, such as forced vaccinations that should exist resisted). When enough people fearfulness God and know their rights every bit written in the Constitution and Beak of Rights and so they can change the organisation in a peaceful way--electing Constitutionalists and God fearing people. Also, God fearing Governors can accept action to restore the rights of the people and defend the Constitution. There is a time when Bible assertive Christians must obey God over Caesar such equally preaching the Gospel and continuing against tyranny; for instance, people were authorized per Bible to resist and fight against Nazi Frg (come across When it is Right to Fight by Dr. Robert A. Morey & and listen to his audio on war located at The Christian and War (nine Part Audio Lecture Series) . Why? Because God limits authority for governments and in that location are different spheres of authority in the Bible that God has delegated (see the Politics/Voting Tab for further information). Nosotros are a Repubilic governed by the Constitution and Bill of Rights--then what is unlike is that elected officials and the States are required to adhere to it or they become lawless! Practiced organizations to join: The John Birch Society (they publish the New American magazine), Gun Owners of America (GOA), Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO), NRA, Oath Keepers & support Infowars.com, etc. These are peaceful organizations and are not anarchists and believe all races are created in the prototype of God. All races welcomed if you believe in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. A Christian Pupil'due south Survival Guide (half-dozen x 9) (club from Xulon Press) by Dr. Robert A. Morey is a neat book for loftier school and college students. Covers all topics.
The Decease Penalty on Trial & The Age of Reason by Elias Boudinot & God & Regime & Original
Christianity and the American Commonwealth & A Nation Adrift & The Constitution DVD Serial
Jury Nullification
Yes, juries in a civil or criminal case accept the power to judge the facts and the law in a particular case. If a juror believes the police force is unjust and unconstutional, the juror tin and has the authority to ignore it--in other words, nullify the law. The whole concept of a jury nullification goes dorsum to the Magna Carta (1215)--this express the corrupt power of the male monarch's courts. This was an important element in our common law. The The states would non even have freedom of printing without jury nullification. Practise y'all recall the Zenger trial of 1735? Jury nullification was too practiced in trials of abolitionists, who were prosecuted for helping slaves escape and to drinkers during the Prohibition era. It does not matter what instructions a judge gives to the juries, they still retain the power to utilise the constabulary or disregard it in the case. A quote from John Adams (second President of the United States (1735 - 1826), "Information technology is not only of constabulary, but his duty...to find the verdict according to his own best agreement, judgment and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court." (Meet the website titled Fully Informed Jury Association and left click the pic "Citizens Rule Volume" to society (world wide web.HomesSchoolPatriot.com) that was written by Charles R. Olsen with two other men. "Charlies" was a World War II Marine Corps veteran and printer from Boston, MA. See Why Jury Nullification Matters (video) --a jury can end the government.)
Rule of Law?
North American Law Eye (01/09/16) -- The RNC has been taken over by criminals and they are promoting Obama'southward Fascist agenda (why are both parties--Democrat & Republican--supporting all these policies?). Social rubber net programs will be gone if the continued illegal conflicting invasion and migrants are not stopped and allowed to come in and jobs are shipped overseas (NAFTA, TPP?). Extract from the North American Law Middle on the Dominion of Law:
...Perhaps the nearly destructive issue…a decision from the courts, instead of remaining a simple decision, becomes law, a precedent, if you will, which further perpetrates the fallacy of Stare Decisis, which by its very concept violates our Rule of Law …that each case shall be judged on its ain merits. These tyrants, who continually violate our Constitutional rights and liberties, are not only in the legal system, only are found in other positions of power, i.e., federal, state and local governments, appointed and/or elected positions, individuals, panels or groups, politicians, agencies, etc...
It is unfortunate that both political parties have sold out the American people except for the few Congressmen/women. We will have a totalitarian authorities with most people poor and the few ultra-rich.
What is the correct way to interpret the Constitution?
The Founders' Biblical philosophy remained the unquestioned standard for law and authorities until the turn of the 20th century. A dissimilar philosophy started to emerge in the mid-twentieth century among judges and educators, which was rejected past the founding fathers. This dissimilar philosophy was ofttimes termed "relativism" or "pragmatism" that means there are no absolute standards and man is the measure of all things (what is right or wrong)--information technology is likewise called "secular humanism". When the "progressives" use this to constabulary, they call it "legal positivism"--it is another word for "relativism". (Legal positivism was adult by Dean Christopher Columbus Langell of Harvard in the 1870's and followed by Dean Roscoe Pound, Supreme Courtroom Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., and others, has been the predominant philosophy taught in law schools during the 1990's.) John Eidsmoe--a retired Lt. Colonel in the Air Force, Constitutional scholar and law professor--summarizes "legal positivism" as follows:
- At that place are no objective, God-given standards of constabulary, or if at that place are, they are irrelevant to the modern legal system.
- Since God is not the author of police, the author of law must be man; in other words, police force is law simply considering the highest human potency, the state, has said information technology is law and is able to back it up by force.
- Since man and society evolve, therefore constabulary must evolve equally well.
- Judges, through their decisions, guide the evolution of police (Note again: Judges "brand law").
- To written report law, become at the original sources of law, the decisions of judges; hence most law schools today use the "instance law" method of teaching law.
There is even a motility worse than the one mentioned above chosen "legal realists". They openly acknowledge using the legal system to promote their ain ends/agenda--the Critical Legal Studies movement is i aspect of "legal realism".
The Constitution is suppose to be interpreted, judged--co-ordinate the founding fathers--only against the specific, self-evident wording of the Constitution, that is the original intent. Alexander Hamilton (01/11/1755 -07/12/1804) one of the Founding fathers and 1st United States Secretary of the Treasury stated the post-obit in Federalist #81 about how to interpret the Constitution:
At that place is non a syllable in the programme [the Constitution] which directly empowers the national courts to metaphrase the laws according to the spirit of the Constitution. (accent added).
James Kent (1763 - 1847) an American jurist, legal scholar and Primary Justice of the New York Country Supreme Court also explained that the Judiciary compare a police force just to "the truthful intent and meaning of the Constitution".
What about Darwinism's influence on law?
Charles Darwin (02/12/1809--04/19/1882), writer of On the Origin of the Species & Voyage at the Beagle at Tierra del Fuego (1831-1836) past Conrad Martens (1801-08/21/1878)
If the theory of evolution is adopted over creation by God, man constabulary is no longer discipline to God. To quote Dr. Augusto Zimmerman (Brazilian-born and an internationally known legal scholar who teaches at Western Australia's Murdoch University):
Equally a consequence of Darwinism, many lawyers embraced the doctrine of legal positivism and interpreted law as a mere result of sheer force and social struggle. Consequently, law was reduced to a mere managerial skill used in the service of social applied science, which is the ascendant view in the legal profession today…
Dr. Augusto farther explains,
Many judges believe that their countries' constitutions should be interpreted as if they were "living documents", instead of being understood according to their original meaning. This apparently 'progressive" view of constabulary regards the constitution of liberal democracies such every bit Australia and the The states as one-time-fashioned certificate that should exist regularly "revised" and "updated", co-ordinate to the "aware" decisions of a few unelected judges. So the "rule of police" is replaced by the "rule of judges".
What were some of the arguments used past early advocates of a "living constitution"?
- Pro-slavery leader Alexander H. Stephens (1812 – 1883), who was a barrister from Georgia and Vice-President of the Confederate States, describes pro-slavery Confederation equally a "progressive lodge".
- Nazis legal theorists stated that the legal system should not be based on fixed rules of police but evolve in a continuous period as a "living law—they were very progressive and acting on "evolutionary scientific discipline".
- After Hitler'south Third Reich, many legal theorists argued that the Nazi laws were valid under legal positivism.i
1Sarfati, J, Law and Creation, Creation, pgs. xvi-17,vol. 31, No. ii, March-May 2009 ( https://cosmos.com)
Should Natural Rights/Natural Law in the Legal profession be rejected even if they were included in the Proclamation of Independence?
Aye, according to Dr. Robert A. Morey (world renowned philosopher and theologian) natural law has caused neat harm to Western civilization, especially the U.s.a.. Dr. Morey states the following about "natural rights" and "natural police force" in Colonial America from his volume entitled The Bible, Natural Police force, and Natural Theology: Conflict or Compromise?, Chapter 11, Pg. 305
The Bible: Natural Theology, Natural Law: Conflict or Compromise? from Xulonpress.com & gratis articles and audio & Video lectures below.
Natural Theology: Is Information technology Biblical? (Audio eight Function Serial)
- Natural Law: Video Interview with Dr. Bob Morey in Las Vegas, NV (2018)
Click pocket-sized picture to purchase at Xulon Press.
Colonial America
This exposes the ugly side of Colonial America. We have conveniently forgotten that the "natural rights" found in the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, Beak of Rights and other documents from that menses did not extend to women, children, slaves or Native Americans. Not even all white males had these rights. Merely land holders were allowed to vote!
When modern Natural theologians pine for the "practiced old days" of Colonial America, I cringe. It means the suppression of women and the enslavement of non-whites. It means slave ships, whips, shackles, auction blocks, raping of women, selling of children, forced labor, torture, and other horrors. No, they were not the "good old days." The historical reality is that Natural Police did non give natural rights to all people. Information technology always fought against extending rights to all people.
The Abolitionist Preachers
It took preachers with a Bible in one hand and a gun in the other to abolish slavery and to extend rights to all people regardless of race or creed. The leaven of Scripture finally worked its way through society and brought an end to slavery. The Ceremonious War was not the beginning, only the end of that procedure.
There was one American church denomination that was ever opposed to slavery. Susan B. Anthony (1820-1906) commented in one of her peppery speeches, The Scotch Covenanters or Reformed Presbyterians is the but evangelical church in all the nominally free states of the North that can consistently merits freedom from all sanction of, or compromise with slavery, "the sum of all villainies." The Onetime Scotch Covenanters refuse church building fellowship not only to slave-holders, but to churches that fellowship slave-holders.
President Thomas Jefferson and the Declaration of Independence
It should be noted that the original draft of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson had written, "We hold these truths to be sacred & undeniable; that all men are created equal & independent, that from that equal creation they derive rights inherent & inalienable..."
Thomas Jefferson recognized that "truths" of human equality and undeniable rights came from the "sacred" scriptures. George Whitfield who was a great revivalist of the Showtime Peachy Awakening had been teaching to the 13 colonies. Unfortunately, the Founders appeased the Enlightenment Rationalists and changed Whitfield/Jefferson'south understanding of "sacred truths" to "self-evident" truths. These Rationalists were confused and idea that "all men are created equal" was common sense. No, information technology is revealed truth. Church leaders were cowards and did not challenge the Rationalist's nonsense in the 1800's.
Endnotes: Spiritual Counterfeits Project (SCP) Journal, volume 44:ane 2021, pages 18 & nineteen. SCP's source: Jefferson, Thomas. "Declaring Independence: Drafting the Documents Jefferson'southward 'Original Crude Draught' of The Declaration of Independence." Liberary of Congress, iv July 1995, www.loc.gov/exhibits/declara/ruffdrft.html.
Judges: Should they be Elected or Appointed?
Judge and Prophetess Deborah (1,200 -- 1,124 BC; Book of Judges) by Gustave Dore
In Pennsylvania the judges are elected and appointed judges practice not outperform elected judges and elected judges are more independent and take on a bigger piece of work load according to a recent study that is reverse to the elitists' propaganda; the elitists want to take away this right in states that take an elected judiciary (it would as well hurt African-Americans in areas that they would not have a black judge or Sheriff if they were appointed). Convicted felon George Soros, who has an international Arrest Warrant out for him issued past President Vladimir Putin of Russia on Jan. 24, 2012, has been trying to change the PA police force to abolish elected judges for his ain personal do good through forepart groups such as Pennsylvanians for Modern Courts that is funded by Soros' Open Order Institute according to The New American; run across article entitled: George Soros Buying Judges At present?--PDF. Besides, See Judges: Should they be Elected or Appointed?)
This is fascism and 1 element of fascism is elitism. This is why you also have some politicians against the Sheriff's Office because they cannot command the Part (the Sheriff is directly accountable to the people). So should we have an oligarch in Hunterdon County or any other canton in this nation? Some Politicians recall that they should engage everyone so they tin can control everything? Is in that location any respect for the Constitutional Officers and the U.S. Constitution in this county? See County Police force vs. Elected Sheriff--PDF (a separate county police force is very expensive and a duplication of services--the Sheriff's Function is a canton law enforcement part and is less expensive. It already exists). See the Local Government Tab and Police/Sportsman Tab for further information on the Sheriff'southward Office.
Note: Judicial Watch -- exposes and fights against abuse in the United States. And a major victory for the United States' citizens: Judge Permanently blocks the NDAA's Provision to Detain Americans Indefintely
Why the Sheriff's Office is the almost important Law Enforcement Agency in the Country
Thomas Jefferson, 3rd President of United States (03/04/1801 -- 03/04/1809)--paradigm by Rembrant Peale (1800) (Sheriff's Office Information on Supplemental Coverage & Mergers -- PDF (2017 Tri-fold Tract)
President Thomas Jefferson called the office of the Sheriff "the about important of all executive offices of the country."
(It should be noted that President Thomas Jefferson included bold anti-slavery language in the original Announcement of Independence, which was removed. He did get passed by Congress in 1807 a bill outlawing the importation of slaves--information technology took effect in 1808.) And Wisconsin Territory was part of the Northwest Territory, where slavery had been banned by an human action of Congress in 1787 at the urging of Thomas Jefferson.
History of Sheriff'due south Part
The Sheriff can exist traced back not only to the Magna Carta (1215) , but to the Volume of Daniel three:2 when King Nebuchadnezzar II (634--562 BC) was reigning. The Sheriff was brought over to North America around 1634 and President Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809) chosen the office of the Sheriff "the nigh important of all executive offices of the country." [See Sheriff David Gee of the Florida Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office established in 1845 (HCSO has over 4,000 employees that conists of two,022 Deputy Sheriffs and Corrections and ane,375 civilians) for further details. It should be noted that Mr. Joseph Thou. Demarest, Jr., former Assistant Director in accuse of the FBI's New York Segmentation, was employed every bit a Deputy Sheriff for the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Function ]. Also, see Sheriff & Magna Carta.
First African-American Sheriff Elected in 1869 in Texas
Because you can elect the Sheriff, there was more opportunity for diverseness. A instance in betoken is Burton Walter Moses (1829 - 1913), who was the first African-American Sheriff elected in 1869 in the Country of Texas in Fort Bend County. Also, he was a Texas Land Senator and a fellow member of the Republican Political party.
Sheriff Richard Mack of Graham Canton, Arizona explains the
role and ability of the Sheriff and why it is important in protecting
the rights of the citizens of this country.
| Charlton Heston & Sheriff Mack | Senator Sylvia Allen, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Richard Mack, Senator Karen Johnson at a rally in Phoenix, AZ, June 2009 |
See Sheriff Mack's website below for further information.
www.sheriffmack.com
Why Merging Township Police force Departments is a Budgetary Disaster unless it is Washed thru the Sheriff's Office ( Sheriff's Office Information on Supplemental Coverage & Mergers -- PDF (2017 Tri-fold Tract) )
Police force Consolidation: The End of Local Police Enforcement--merging local Twp. Police Depts. has been a budgetary disaster and volition set the stage for the creation of local police departments condign an outpost of the federal law-enforcement bureau such every bit the DHS & the utilize of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) is another bad idea (run into above article)---this is non the case with the Sheriff's Office (an elected Constitutional Part). This is why whatsoever mergers planned should merely exist done thru the Sheriff's Office. The Sheriff's salary is set past NJ Statute (which is lower than almost Chiefs' of Police force, only tin can be raised past the Freeholders), and citizens will keep their direct control and local sovereignty (many high ranking NJ State Police back up merging thru the Sheriff'southward Office)--whatsoever county police force such equally Bergen County and Marriage County (duplication of services) should be merged into the county Sheriff's Office; encounter Senator Gerald Cardinale submits pecker to merge Bergen County Police, with Sheriff's Department). The Bergen County Freeholders who voted yeah for the merger should be complimented, but County Executive Kathleen Donovan (who is either misinformed or intimidated past the county police and is no longer a Freeholder every bit of 2015; the new Freeholder voted yes to merge into the Sheriff's Office) should be ashamed of herself for whatever opposition in mergering the county constabulary forcefulness into the Bergen County Sheriff's Function--an existing county law enforcement part that has ane of the summit forensic labs in the Land. (See the Police force/Sportsmen & Local Gov.Tab for further information on using the Sheriff's Office.)
Misinformation most Twp. Constabulary mergers in Somerset County, NJ exposed: Say "NO" to Somerset Merging 19 Twp. Police Departments-PDF. The Somerset Freeholders and Prosecutor owe Somerset an apology for promoting this stupid plan. Clarification and Fact Sheet on County Police for Elected Officials in NJ & PA (03/11/xiii)--PDF .
Are Corporations Entitled to Gratis Speech? And What nigh 2010 Citizens United vs. FEC case (which lifted most federal regulations on unlimited corporate election spoken communication)?
Yes, it is constitutional. Had the McCain-Feingold law (the law explicitly exempted "press" corporations such as the Boston World, New York Times and the half-dozen mega media corporations--that control 90% of the information Americans hear--such as CNN, MSNBC, Flim-flam News, etc.) been in place in the 1830s through the 1850s, abolition of slavery would likely have been a lot longer before it was abolished. This is also truthful of disclosure laws--civil rights organizations in the 1950s and 1960s probably would non have gotten off the ground if they had to disclose their donors and their addresses to every Ku Klux Klan fellow member. Civil rights organizations are organized under 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Lawmaking. Run across the in-depth article on this thing by The New American dated 09/12/12 entitled Are Corporations Entitled to Free Speech?
Is Administrative Law Ramble?
Left: Headquarters of the Federal Trade Committee in Washington, D.C. (who has regulatory authority)
Administrative law "allows for the creation of public regulatory agencies" and "contains all the statutes, judicial decisions and regulations that govern them." In other words, information technology allows bureaucracies to create a body of law and then implement their powers and duties in the form of rules, regulations, orders, and decisions.
Where did the adminstrative police originate from? The Progressives, who disdain the Constitution as inefficient, founded the administraive regime in lodge to overturn the Constitution. The origins of authoritative law came from Germany to America. They considered government a benevolent deity, non the enemy the founders of America feared. This was the philiosophy of Nazi Frg-- the Land is supreme. In the 1870s, many U.Southward. citizens were attracked to German universities for avant-garde degrees in economics that promoted this philosophy.
Is administrative police force constitutional? No. It is a abdication of the legislature not doing its job. This is why agencies escape general scrutiny when they saddle industries with many burdens and regulations. And so in addition to the three branches of government, yous too have bureaucracies intertwined in the three branches of government. An agency tin write laws a la Congress and enforce them like the executive and the coup de grace adjudicates like a courtroom. (Information technology should be noted that administrative law through regulatory agencies has also been detrimental in destroying the father's authority in the dwelling house and family--unfortunately, the police enforcement community no longer knows the difference between law, with its checks and balances, and the policies and procedures that are in administraive law; authoritative police gets its authority from statutes, not the Constitution.)
For further information see The New American mag, Sept. 5, 2011 edition entitled The Second Set of Books past Becky Akers.
Restraining Orders Out of Command
When the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 sponsored by Senator Joseph Biden (D-Del.) and Senator Barbara Box (D-Calif.) and was signed into law by President Clinton, it took a bad system and made information technology worse. The human action provided federal money to foment more dissension between the sexes and funnels money to certain favored programs. Information technology also instructs local police to make more arrests and coordinates interstate enforcement of abuse-protection orders. The human action is highly discriminatory and gives fiscal, political, legal advantage to women in the family courtroom. There have been several versions of the act passed in intervening years. (Supporting the Biblical definition of a family and its obligations and duties of a married man and married woman is far more effective in preventing violence against women.)
A list of major problems with the Violence Against Women Act of 1994:
- An bidder can get a domestic-abuse restraining order for almost whatsoever reason.
- Respecting Accurateness in Domestic Abuse Reporting (RADAR) issued a report that stated that information technology is as easy to get a restraining order every bit a angling or hunting license—RADAR states: "The law defines almost any interpersonal maladjustment every bit 'domestic violence,' the courts and then establish procedures to expedite the issuance of these orders."
- Many women employ the restraining lodge option for ulterior motives, such as to get custody of children without a court hearing, quick eviction hearing, added advantage in divorce and revenge.
- There are no rules of evidence, burden of proof, cross examination, no jury when an applicant files a restraining-gild—the woman can come to court secretly and but state she feels fearful. I woman even filed a complaint for against her husband for kicking a plastic cooler while leaving the business firm after he institute that she was having an adulterous human relationship—she filed a full of 14 faux criminal complaints nigh violations of the order.
- There were four,796 emergency protective-orders petitions issued in Westward Virginia in 2006; an estimated eighty.half-dozen percentage "are imitation or unnecessary" and cost the country $xviii,200,000 according to professor of accountancy Benjamin P. Foster, Ph.D, CPA, CMA.
- Women commit corruption more than men and this is confirmed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Command and Prevention. There study states: "In non-reciprocally vehement relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than than 70 percent of the cases. Reciprocity was associated with more frequent violence amid women, but not men."
- Restraining orders violate and interfere with Second Amendment rights. The land'south laws require that a accused surrender all guns and ammunition (information technology is not simply a state crime, simply a federal one under this act). Many constabulary enforcement officers and military police had to have a desk chore because their wives' got a restraining order confronting them and thus lost their right to deport a weapon—this is a disgrace.
- Restraining Orders Out of Control
- NJ Alimony Reform
- The Feminist Motility has caused the Undermining of Due Procedure of Men--PDF
The Violence Against Women Deed of 1994 and all subsequent acts should be immediately repealed. Many of the liberal politicians and (many conservative politicians pressured by the feminists) in both parties are responsible for the passage of this highly discriminatory and family destroying act. Please lobby your Congressmen and Senators to repeal these laws.
Gregory A. Hessian, J.D. "Restraining Orders Out of Control" New American (Baronial iv, 2008): 12-17
Say "No" for a Con-Con
In that location are serious consequences for land-initiated constitutional conventions. Article V states that Congress, "on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments." Amendements is plural. Yes, the Constitution authorizes the consideration of more than than one amendment at such a convention. History backs this up. When the 16th Subpoena (the individual income tax), the 17th Subpoena (direct election of U.S. Senators), and the 18th Amendment (prohibition of alcohol) were passed by Congress (all iii Amendments were very harmful to the Republic), they nonetheless were ratified past three-fourths of united states. It should be noted that the promotion of the 18th Amendment was in response to the Bear Nation'south Motion and was condemned by Dr. Machen and many other fundamentalist Christians as being in conflict with Scripture. Booze in moderation is biblically permissible and not sin.
In the event that the U.Due south. had a constitutional convention and state legislatures opposed any new Amendments or new constitution at the convention, the Congress has the power under Commodity V to circumvent the State Legislatures. They can authorize special country conventions to ratify a new constitution or new Amendments. This was the case in 1933 when Congress wanted to repeal prohibition through the 21st Subpoena--Congress authorized state conventions to ratify the 21st Amendment and repeal the 18th Amendment otherwise it would not have passed. Many states such as Utah were staunchly opposed to its repeal.
A constitutional convention would open the opportunity to abolish our ramble republican form of government. Tell your elected officials to enforce the constitution through nullification of unconstitutional federal laws and interpret the constitution past its original intent. Come across StopTheConCon.com & Levin, Limbaugh, Hannity calling for a Con-Con--don't listen to them & States Should Enforce, non Revise the Constitution by the New American Magazine--PDF & Exposing the real agenda behind the push for an Article Five convention (YouTube) past Publius Huldah. (This presentation was given on April 17, 2017 at the beautiful sometime Supreme Courtroom Bedchamber at the Tennessee Capitol Building in Nashville.)
What near the Partriot Act Extension?
S. 990 extended for iv years iii provisions of the Patriot Human action that were set to elapse. The three provisions are: 1. The "roving wire tap" provision that allows the federal government to wiretap whatever number of a doubtable's phone/Internet connections without specifying what they will find or how many connections will exist tapped; ii. the "financial records" provision that allows the feds to seize "whatever tangible affair" that has "relevance" to an investigation; iii. the "alone wolf" provision that allows spying on not-U.South. citizens without a warrant. These provisions violate the Fourth Amendment of the U.Due south. Constitution, which requires that no warrants be issued "simply upon probable cause" (a much highter standard than "relevance"), and that warrants must contain language "particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to exist siezed."
Under the Patriot Act, the FBI can issue warrants called "National Security Letters" without going to a guess. This provision never expired.
All police force enforcement personnel should accept opposed the extension of the Patriot Act--your oath is to the U.S. Constitution, not to your superior or pay cheque. The and then-called "War on Terror" is lost if the U.Due south. Constitution is destroyed or gutted. Why is the edge not existence sealed? Many retired Federal Agents have spoken out about this and many other issues at anti-terrorism symposiums. See Forfeiting "Enduring Liberty" for Homeland Security" : A Constitutional Analysis of USA Patriot Act and the Justice Department'south Anti-terrorism Intiatives.
What virtually The National Defense Authority Act (NDAA)?
This is one of the about disgraceful pieces of legislation ever passed--it was approved by the House of Representatives (283 - 136) and the Senate (86 - thirteen) on Dec. xv, 2011. Since this bill labels all of America a "battlefield" in the "War on Terror", it can concord American citizens without charges or a trial for an indefinite detention. It volition also allow the Pentagon to care for the Cyberspace as a 'battleground". So any dissent on the internet could be quashed. This bill gives the president enormous powers under section 1021 to arrest and jail people, by use of the military machine, without due process (run into the fifth & 6th Amendment).
The use of admiralty courts (military tribunals) and the applying the laws of war to the colonists and the infamous Star Chamber in English language history was the reason the Founding Fathers made sure that international laws of war would utilise only to strange enemies--they tin now be applied to American citizens. The Commodity II Treason Clause establishes for non-military citizens to be tried in a civilian court. Also, international laws practise non trump our Bill of Rights. One of the causes for the American Revolution was the denial of the right to a jury trial. Every member of Congress that signed this bill should be thrown out of office. Information technology has null to do with "Homeland Security."
TheHill.com posted this report quoting Dr. Ron Paul [a Republican Congressman in the 14th district in Texas, who served in the United states Air Force as a flight surgeon (1963 to 1965) and the U.S. Air National Guard (1965 to 1968)] and stated the following: "GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul warned that the National Defense Potency Human activity, which was passed past Congress this month, will advance the country'south 'slip into tyranny' and virtually assures 'our descent into totalitarianism.'
President Barack Obama has signed this pecker (NDAA) from his holiday rental in Kailua, Hawaii making this his last official deed in 2011. Two retired four-star Marine generals wanted the president to veto the bill in a New York Times op-ed stating it is "misguided and unnecessary." Osama bin Laden was just handed a victory with the passage of this neb.
Historical note: In 1933, the German Reichstag passed the Enabling Human action, granting to Adolf Hitler the expansive powers that helped create his ruthless dictatorship. The NDAA gives similiar powers to the President and for much the same reason: the protection of the people.
The priviledge of a writ of habeas corpus (dervived from the Latin for "you may take the body") guaranteed by Article I , Section nine of the Constitutition has now been suspended. Now a U.South. citiizen does non have the right to due process of police and the right to know what charges are being made against him. The concept of habeas corpus formed a large part of the Anglo-American jurisprudence since the 14th century and the principles can be establish in the Magna Carta written in 1215.
A quote from Alexander Hamilton (writing as a Publius) from The Federalist, No. 84:
The institution of the writ ofhabeas corpus, the prohibition ofex mail service facto laws, and of TITLES OF Dignity, to which we accept no corresponding provision in our Constitution, are perchance greater securities to liberty and republicanism than any it contains. The cosmos of crimes afterwards the commission of the fact, or, in other words, the subjecting of men to penalisation for things which, when they were done, were breaches of no police force, and the practice of arbitrary imprisonments, have been, in all ages, the favorite and well-nigh formidable instruments of tyranny.
Northward Carolina in 2012 and other states have drafted resolutions to nullify NDAA because it violates Manufactures I, Department ix (habeas corpus guarantee); Article III, Section two (right to a trial past jury); and Article III, Department three (the definition of treason). Each of these critical clauses of the Constitution are said to exist violated by the NDAA, according to the bill's authors in N Carolina.
Specifically targeted in H.R. 982 is Department 1021 of the NDAA. Section 1021 places the American military at the disposal of the President for the apprehension, arrest, and detention of those suspected of posing a danger to the homeland (whether within or exterior the borders of the United States and whether the suspect exist a citizen or foreigner).
Under the provisions of Section 1021, the President is afforded the absolute power to arrest and detain citizens of the United states of america without their being informed of whatever criminal charges, without a trial on the claim of those charges, and without a scintilla of the due process safeguards protected by the Constitution of the United States.
Unfortunately, tyranny is being implemented little by little past the oligarchy currently ruling on Capitol Colina. Also, see Aid U.s.a. Terminate the NDAA.
What about Torture in the 2014 Senate Committee Report?
The naive U.s.a.Senators believe torture is justified because nosotros are engaged in warfare (June five, 1942 was last time Congress actually passed a declaration of war). Any civilian government agency such as the CIA take to ignore the post-obit 3 amendments in the Bill of Rights: 1. fifth Amendment'southward prohibition against holding a person answerable for a offense without an indictment from a one thousand jury; 2. 6th Amendments' guarantee of a speedy and public trial in the state or commune where the crime was committed; and 3. 8th Amendment's prohibition confronting cruel and unusual punishment.
If yous recollect in that location is nothing wrong with this behavior, you will make a groovy Nazis.[Come across Controversy Continues Regarding Senate Committee Report on CIA Torture (12/xi/14) & U.S. Torture Practices Correct Out Of Nazi Playbook (CIA torture widespread in Middle East) - -12/12/14, Video & America in Crisis by Dr. Peter Hammond (Missionary from South Africa) .
States can Nullify Federal Laws if they are Unconstitutional--remember the Figitive Slave Law?
In 1854, Wisconsin rejected the federal Fugitive Slave Human action, which mandated Northern states return Southern slaves without due process, demonstrating both the validity and usefulness of nullification. (Run into article entitled How State Nullification Can Defy Tyrannical Government.)
Qualifications for President of the United states of america and What a Natural-Born Citizen Is
Article ii, Department 1, Clause v of the U.S. Constitution stipulates presidential eligibility, requiring the nation'south elected chief to be a "natural born citizen."
The clause states: "No person except a natural born citizen, or a Denizen of the Usa, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Function of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of xxx-v Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the Usa."
The Supreme Court did address the significant of "natural-born citizen" in Article 2, Section I of the Constitution in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874). Main Justice Waite stated:
The constitution does non, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children built-in in a country of parents who were citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.
According to this standard, Republican Senator Marco Rubio of Florida , Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, Republican Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana and President Barack Obama (unless he was just hiding the fact of who his existent father was--Frank Align David) might not qualify. The President'southward parents would only have to exist U.South. citizens at the time or his or her birth, non natural-built-in citizens. Information technology has to exist both parents.
The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution specifically defines "citizen" only not "natural-born denizen."
The word "natural-born citizen" is only used in the presidential requirement clause.
What about Obama's Qualifications?
Land of Hawaii became a official state of the U.S. in 1959
Note: The whole forged birth document episode could have been a set up from the White House to draw attention away from the fact that "Frank Marshal Davis" was his real father according to Infowars. See Video: Obama Admits Noted Communist "Schooled" Him On White Racism (04/15/fifteen) --Barack Obama admitted in a recently unearthed 1995 video that the Communist schooled him on white racism.
(A lot of the blame can be attributed to the long history of discrimination in this country--seminaries in the South would non allow blackness people to enroll, etc. And we wonder why prominent African-Americans are adhereing to Communism or other anti-God philosophies. Shame on the coward U.South. Evangelicals who did not accept a stand against segregation--they use the same excuse to not stand up for marriage in the 21st century (thumbs upwards for the Christians who did take a stand back in the 1960s and the Republicans who got the Civil Rights Human action 1964 passed; encounter Should Natural Rights/Natural Law exist rejected? on this tab for further details.)
The legislative and judicial bodies of the U.S. government take held no formal discussions, nor did they bear a single formal investigation into whether Obama is eligible to serve nether the Fourteenth Amendment.
Congress did, still, question the "natural born" qualifications of Obama'south 2008 presidential opponent, Republican Sen. John McCain.
The scion of distinguished U.Due south. naval officers, McCain was born to two American parents in the Panama Culvert Zone. On Apr thirty, 2008, the U.S. Senate sought to answer the question past passing a nonbinding resolution, which states, "Whereas John Sidney McCain, Iii, was born to American citizens on an American armed forces base in the Panama Culvert Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, exist information technology resolved, that John Sidney McCain, Iii, is a 'natural built-in citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States."
The resolution clearly determined "natural born" to mean born of two parents who are U.Due south. citizens.
An excerpt from WorldNetDaily commodity dated 10/02/eleven titled: Debate is over! He'southward not natural born
So there is no avoiding the fact that all members of the U.Due south. Senate know what natural born citizen means, that John McCain is ane, and that Barack Hussein Obama isn't.
The McCain resolution was based upon the official legal opinion of Tribe & Olson,posted hither in pdf form. The Tribe & Olson opinion states clearly:
Nosotros conclude that Senator McCain is a "natural born Citizen" by virtue of his birth in 1936 to U.South. citizen parents who were serving their land on a U.Due south. military base of operations in the Panama Canal Zone. The circumstances of Senator McCain's birth satisfy the original pregnant and intent of the Natural Born Citizen Clause, as confirmed by subsequent legal precedent and historical practise.
The Tribe & Olson opinion was based upon an in-depth legal review of all related historical legal decisions since the formation of our country. But it all begins with a statement made on March 26, 1790 in 104 Start CONGRESS. SESS. II. Cn. 4. 1790:
"[T]he children of citizens of the United States, that may exist born across sea, or out of the limits of the United states of america, shall be considered as natural built-in citizens:"
Once again, no matter the birth place of John McCain or any other kid born of U.S. parents, whether built-in across sea, in or out of the limits of the United States territory – the natural born kid of U.Due south. parents "shall be considered as natural born citizens."
....Every member of the U.S. Supreme Court and every half-intelligent member of the U.S. Congress knows what natural born citizen is, what the U.Southward. Constitution requires for the offices of president and vice president, and that Barack Hussein Obama II is non eligible or otherwise qualified for the function he currently holds by mode of the virtually massive fraud ever perpetrated on the American people...
Read the following two articles for further information:
Sheriff Arpaio Proves Obama Nativity Document Forged (12/xvi/sixteen) -- Proof Obama's birth document is a phony. Lets congratulate Former Bergen County, NJ Detective Mike Zullo and Sheriff Arpaio for their hard piece of work.
Birther Elevation--a gathering of truth
Debate is over! He is not natural built-in
Washington reinterprets constitutional eligibility
Pravada (a Russian News website) Asks: What Happened to American Media?
Stunner! Balanced CBS Report on Arpaio Probe into Obama'south forged birth document
Donald Trump: Say it is and so, Sheriff Joe--Trump supports Arpaio's Investigation.
Natural Born Citizen Divers by our Framers
Flag of the State of Hawaii
In order to understand what was meant past natural-born citizen, ane has to go to the start law that the U.South. Congress passed in 1790 defining the natural-born denizen. The Naturalization Act of 1790 did not have a person a natural-born denizen if they were born on U.Southward. soil, merely but referred to parentage: "The children of citizens of the U.s., that may be born across sea, or out of the limits of the United States," the Act states, "shall exist considered as natural born citizens: Provided, that the correct of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the The states."
The following people offered a definition on natural-born citizenship:
ane. Representative John Birgham of Ohio, the main framer of the Fourteenth Subpoena states, ..."United Sates of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is...a natural born citizen."
two. The Police force of Nations past Swiss legal philosopher Emmerich de Vattel in 1758 was used past many of our founding fathers equally a source of understanding of police force, which was established in the Constitution of 1787. His treatise in Volume 1, Chapter 19 states, "The natives, or natural-built-in citizens, are those built-in in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the social club cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than past the children of the citizens, those childern naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights....In order to be of the state, it is necessary that a person be born of a male parent who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country."
The meaning of natural-born citizen will either not be discussed or the people will be lied to past your major media outlets, but there are many legal cases that support the in a higher place definition. Wikipedia has unfortunately sanitized its site of the true definition of natural-born citizen later the release of President Obama's birth document (President Obama was probably born in Hawaii and both parents were U.Southward. citizens, but information technology has been alleged that the President did not want people to know his real male parent who might be Frank Align Davis--run across Video: Obama Admits Noted Communist "Schooled" Him On White Racism (04/15/fifteen)). Also, there has been no investigation by the major media outlets on the authenticity of the nascence certificate. For further data encounter articles past WorldNetDaily entitled Authors:Even Hawaii birth won't make Obama eligible (April, 28, 2011), Bombshell: U.Due south. Government questioned Obama citizenship in 1966 (May 9, 2011), That artificial birth document (May 12, 2011) , Criminal Complaint Filed with FBI over Nascency-Certificate "Forgery" (June v, 2011) , Ex-CIA: "Forged Certificate Released as Birth Certificate (June 15, 2011), Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Posse: 'Probable Cause' Obama Certificate a Fraud (Sheriff Joe is a retired DEA Agent and served in the U.S. Ground forces) and Police force Professor says Flim-flam News Anchor does not know what the hell he is talking about in regards to what the significant of a "Natural Built-in Citizen" is for presidential eligibility.
Birther Elevation--a gathering of truth
The Truth almost the Bundy Ranch in Nevada and how the Government is Lying
-
Thousands of Citizens defend the Bundy Ranch in Nevada against the BLM--see "video" entitled BLM & Tyranny of Regulation (a clip from Dr. Martin Luther Rex Jr. on unjust laws) on what the State Controlled Media is not telling you.
-
What about the jurisdictional issues? and the "Nevada Open Land Laws?"--see BLM is in driect conflict with Commodity one, Department 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution & Federal Judge: BLM Engaged In a Criminal Conspiracy Against Ranchers (video)--the Rise of Command Filigree & Interview past David Knight of Infowars of Cliven Bundy: Domestic Patriot (video--04/19/14).
-
Hours After Infowars Breaks Sen. Reid (D-Nev.)? Chinese Connection to Bundy Land Grab, BLM Backs Down (04/12/14) --- The Infowars exclusive yesterday exposing U.South. Senate Bulk Leader Harry Reid's (D-Nev.) involvement in the Bureau of Land Management's land catch, which was meant to push out American ranchers such as Cliven Bundy in order to make way for Chinese solar farms, was the #1 news story in the entire world over the by 24 hours thanks to the Drudge Written report and others, forcing the BLM to retreat from the standoff. (As well, run into from The New American an commodity entitled War on the West: Why More than Bundy Standoffs Are Coming.)
Some facts: i. The federal government is non "the landowner" of the "public lands" and Cliven Bundy is non a "tenant" or "freeloader"; 2. The "public lands" in the Western states are comprised of what is known as the "separate estate"; 3. Ownership is split between surface rights (wildlife, timber, grazing, water) and subsurface rights (gas, oil, minerals) that are divided among mutiple owers; 4. The multiple owners are federal regime, country gpvernments, private individuals, and corporations; 5. Subsurface rights are owned past the federal government, which is questionable (Virginia's Act of Cession of 1784 stipulated that the ceded lands would exist disposed of for revenue for the The states and state legislatures and members of Congress are challenging the federal government; half dozen. Cliven Bundy with many other rangers owns range rights that were bought and paid for by Land-utilise law in the arid Western states that falls under the "Prior Appropriation Water Doctrine"--the person who acquires title to the water has a right to acquire the use of as much land as is necessary to put the h2o to beneficial use; vii. Bardon 5. Northern Pacific Railway Company has been cited 133 times by other courts and has never been overturned in whole or in part.
Also, see United states of america v. Manor of Hage--U.S. Federal District Courtroom Estimate Robert C. Jones states that the BLM engaged in a criminal conspiracy against ranchers. The BLM ignores Article 1, Section eight, Clause 17 of the Constitution--the clause is known as the Enclave Clause that authorizes Congress to purchase, own and control country in a state under specific and limited conditions: arsenals, dockyards, magazines, the erection of forts, not to protect a tortoise.
Helpful articles on the Constitution and Bill of Rights
- Constitutionalism 101 --PDF
- Republic vs. Democracy--PDF
- How to decipher the Constitution--PDF
- Religion and Firearms by Dr. Peter Hammond—PDF or FirePower and Faith
- Thomas Woods--History, the Constitution and Nullification by States.
- Lawmakers in 35 States move to reclaim sovereignty nether 10th Amendment provision
- Thomas More Law Heart
- The Electorial College: Preserve or Abolish?--PDF
- LEAGLE--Comprehensive Constabulary Library: Federal and Country
- The Supreme Court is not the last step in opposition--the Declaration of Independence is
- Lord Mockton, Copenhagin and the Constitution (Treaties cannot override the Constitution)—PDF
- The Feminist Movement Has Acquired the Undermining of Due Process for Men--PDF
- Fully Informed Jury Clan - see their media catalog
- Handbook for Juries
- Caught. Net - Jurors' Handbook
- Sherrif Mack - the Constitutional Authorization of the Sheriff'due south Role.
- High School Students Lose more of their Rights—1957 vs. 2009 --PDF
- Supreme Courtroom of the United States - await up documents.
- Dumbing downwards the Constitution--the natural-built-in citizen requirement for president
Come across Second Amendment Tab for an a detailed explanation on the original intent on the "right to keep and bear arms."
LibertyNewsNetwork--a news system that defends the Constitution.
https://www.libertynewsnetwork.tv
Renew America, click link for Declaration of Independence, U.South. Constitution, Federalist Papers, Anti-Federalist Papers, Communist Manifesto, etc. https://world wide web.renewamerica.com/documents_menu.htm
For more than information on the Constitution click the side bar .
Note: This is why information technology is important to appoint "Strict Constructionist" judges.
Legal References--Abbreviations for New Jersey Law, U.S. and PA (NJ Permanent Statutes)
1. et seq ("and the post-obit") 2. C.F.R (Code of Federal Regulations)
iii. N.J. (New Bailiwick of jersey Supreme Written report) 4. N.J.A.C. (New Jersey Administrative Code)
five. N.J.South. (New Jersey Statutes) 6. N.J.S.A (New Jersey Statutes Annotated)
7. N.J.Super (New Jersey Superior Court Reports) eight. U.South.C. (United States Code)
9. U.S.C.A. (United States Code Annotated) ten. 18 Pa C.S. & 6111 (Title eighteen, PA Offense Codes, Section)
x. New Jersey Register & NJ Administrative Code (provided by LexisNexis--link besides on the "Dept. of Corrections" website
The two sites below have official government links to PA and NJ Firearms Constabulary and other areas. Besides, see second Amendment Tab and Right-to-Carry Tab for further information.
- Firearms Owners Against Crime—PA Pro-Gun Political Action group that has Voter'southward Guides by County, PA Laws under Championship 18 & smashing pro 2nd Amendment links.
www.foac-pac.org - AllStays Travel--New Jersey and other states Gun Laws and Travel Advice.
www.allstays.com - Nazi Weapons Laws of Nov 11, 1938--Gun Command has always resulted in Genocide.
www.jpfo.org - Death past Gun Control--A Genocide Chart of Countries that confiscated guns.
world wide web.jpfo.org
Listen to Alex Jones
from 12:00 to 3:00 PM EST (Infowars)
| | In Memory of Dr. Bob Morey (11/13/46 -- 01/05/19) | |
| | |
Source: https://www.njiat.com/constitution.html
0 Response to "Publius Huldah Exposingthe Dangers of an Art V Convention Youtube"
Post a Comment